| Feigenbaum Constant Approximations | |
A curious approximation to the Feigenbaum constant
is given by
| (1) |
where
is Gelfond's constant, which is good to 6 digits to the right of the decimal point.
M. Trott (pers. comm., May 6, 2008) noted
| (2) |
where
is Gauss's constant, which is good to 4 decimal digits, and
| (3) |
where
is the tetranacci constant, which is good to 3 decimal digits.
A strange approximation good to five digits is given by the solution to
| (4) |
which is
| (5) |
where
is the Lambert W-function (G. Deppe, pers. comm., Feb. 27, 2003).
| (6) |
gives
to 3 digits (S. Plouffe, pers. comm., Apr. 10, 2006).
M. Hudson (pers. comm., Nov. 20, 2004) gave
| (7) | |||
| (8) | |||
| (9) |
which are good to 17, 13, and 9 digits respectively.
Stoschek gave the strange approximation
![]() | (10) |
which is good to 9 digits.
R. Phillips (pers. comm., Sept. 14, 2004-Jan. 25, 2005) gave the approximations
| (11) | |||
| (12) | |||
| (13) | |||
| (14) | |||
| (15) | |||
| (16) |
where e is the base of the natural logarithm and
is Gelfond's constant, which are good to 3, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 10 decimal digits, respectively, and
| (17) | |||
| (18) | |||
| (19) | |||
| (20) | |||
| (21) | |||
| (22) | |||
| (23) |
which are good to 3, 3, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 8 decimal digits, respectively.
An approximation to
due to R. Phillips (pers. comm., Jan. 27, 2005) is obtained by numerically solving
| (24) |
for
, where
is the golden ratio, which is good to 4 digits.
